Note: Some Adult Language --  After many years in the corporate world, I've decided to return to collect my advanced degree and begin teaching some of what I've learned ...More

New - Gifts from Hawai`i

Beer Stein

Royalty Free Stock Photos and Art at 808StockPhoto.com. Low fee, high quality, stock photography and art for professionals. No subscription fees.
Friend Map
Add Yourself To My Map

Recent Comments:

  • Dr. Raja: Request you to visit my site www.3ifoundation.org which offers...
  • Dr. Raja: Request you to visit my site www.3ifoundation.org which offers...
  • sue: YAY!!!!!
  • Karen (ticklebug): I hope you weren't thinking that I was a spam bot? I...
  • Karen (ticklebug): Hey, where you been these days, homie? :twisted:...
  • Statistics
    168 dubious bits of wisdom and 2,321 comments received, in 10 categories.

    (24) comments waiting

    Tuesday - June 28, 2005

    The Decline of The American Family

    Filed under: Crappola — DB @ 10:00 pm

    I recently read an article on the decline of the American family.

    Let me preface what I’m saying below with this… I believe that there are few "jobs" that a man can do any better than a woman, I just don’t believe that a woman should be forced into doing a job because of circumstances.  I firmly believe in equal rights, but to me that also includes people having choices in their lives.

    Neither the human male, nor the human female body was built for the pressures and stresses today’s world places on us. In my opinion, the only thing the "feminist" movement did was to give the Corporate World more cannon fodder. Unfortunately we have no one else to blame… we did it to ourselves. We let it happen to us.

    Somewhere along the line couples forgot one very important ingredient in marriages, I think. Marriage is a partnership… two people working together as a team. Each has their strengths, and using those strengths together means surviving and prospering. When marriages become a competition to prove who is the "better man" no one wins.

    Do I think this was a conscious choice for most of them? Not at all. I think that society in general has forced the issue. Let’s face it… men biologically are hunter gatherers… women are more nuturing. Why should a woman feel that she must go out and kill a shark to be successful? Why should a man feel that he must cultivate his sensitive side and supress his agressive, passionate desire to succeed side to be successful? Certainly a woman should be "capable" of killing a shark if necessary, but why should it be "expected" of her as a general rule by forcing her into a Corporate shark tank? Do we really want, 100 years from now, to have nothing but a bunch of passive and sensitive people running our world, either male or female? Who will step forward to make any decisions or take any action… because after all, passion itself is also declining in our world. In a hundred years, where will the passion and conviction in our leaders come from if society has bred those attributes out of human beings?

    Are men and women choosing their mates today based on love and conviction… or on who makes the most money?  What happens to a family when the market crashes… do most of them stick together and fight it out through thick and thin… or simply look for a better market?

    What was the catalyst for much of this? I believe that in its basic nature it began as a survival technique. Let’s face it, most families can’t exist anymore in today’s world unless both parents work. To give our families what they need by today’s standards anyway. Our societies answer to this was to put both people to work. Maybe what we should have done was to figure out ways for a family to survive as a family, rather than simply adding to our problems.

    Saturday - June 18, 2005

    Computer Bigots

    Filed under: Crappola — DB @ 11:41 am

    Tech Wench commented recently on a subject near and dear to my own heart, having been in Tech Support myself for a few years.  Her term for the manifestation was Zealot, while I would prefer

    BIGOT

    n : a prejudiced person who is intolerant of any opinions differing from his own

    From the 15th century on Old French bigot meant “an excessively devoted or hypocritical person.” Bigot is first recorded in English in 1598 with the sense “a superstitious hypocrite.”

    A person who is religiously attached to a particular computer,
    language, operating system, editor, or other tool.  Usually found with a specifier; thus,"Cray bigot", "ITS bigot", "APL bigot", "VMS bigot", "Berkeley
    bigot", ("Windows bigots", "Unix bigots"). Real bigots can be distinguished from mere partisans or zealots by the fact that they refuse to learn alternatives even when the march of time and/or technology is threatening to obsolete the favoured tool. It is truly said "You can tell a bigot, but you can’t tell him much."

    For the non-technical people out there this is probably a little confusing. Since you’re reading this post to begin with, it’s most likely that you’re using a computer that uses either Microsoft Windows, or Apple.  There are other operating systems that also have a version of Internet browser (like Internet Explorer and Netscape), but the two most popular desktop or personal computers are currently running either Windows or Apple.  This isn’t just personal opinion, but I don’t have any ready statistics on it… if you don’t believe me you’ll have to look it up yourself.

    Ok, so there’s the background.  The reasons Tech Wench and I, as well as most other IT people, have a problem with Technical Bigotry, is that it ends up causing a lot of unnecessary friction and heated discussion.

    Here’s an example of the stupidity of all this:

    I have a 4ft. by 12ft. garden I want to dig in my back yard.  I want to dig down three feet so I can put in good soil mixed with fertilizer.

    Solution one:

    1. Measure off the area

    2. Mark the area with string

    3. Grab my trusty shovel

    4. Start digging

    Solution two:

    1. Measure off the area

    2. Mark the area with string

    3. Rent a backhoe

    4. Move my fence so I can get the backhoe into the back yard

    5. Hire somebody to drive the backhoe

    6. Schedule the dig

    7. Dig the hole

    8. Repair the damage to my lawn from the backhoe

    9. Fix the fence

    The point is that using the right tool for the job gets the job done efficiently. It’s ridiculous to use a tool that isn’t really designed to do the job we need done.  In the long run it ends up costing us more time and money than just using a simple and easy to use interface.  If I were digging a pool I’d want to use a backhoe because it’s the most efficient tool for the job.  Even if I were a backhoe operator I probably wouldn’t choose to use it to dig my garden.

    How does my example apply to technical stuff?  Well, I happen to be a Certified Microsoft Professional.  That doesn’t mean however that I insist on using a Microsoft product to do every thing I need to do technically.  I use Adobe Photoshop for graphics, and Macromedia Studio for web design, for instance… because they’re what I like.  They are what I am familiar with.  You may have programs that you like, and does that bother me… not in the least.

    The bottom line for me is that a lot of technical people want to make a campaign out of knocking the other guy.  In my career I have been a Novell Administrator, an OS/2 Administrator, a Lotus Notes Administrator, and a Windows System Admininistrator, as well as directing all of the above including Unix.  Each operating system has its use and advantages.  An Engineering company may want to use Unix because a lot of Engineering applications are written for Unix systems, while an Accounting company may want to use a Windows system because their favorite application is written in Windows.  Does that mean that one is necessarily better than the other?  Not really, and to continually keep making that claim is simply ignorant.  Do I care that Bill Gates makes a lot of money this year because his company sells a good user friendly product (in my opinion) compared to some others that you have to know command line commands to use?  Hell no, I would rather click and drag anytime than to have to type out everything the same way I did years ago… I guess I’m just lazy that way… or it may also be that I can get a lot done faster by a few mouse clicks.  Do I care if you want to use another operating system on your personal computer? Hell no, knock yourself out. I use what I like, and so should you. 

    So here’s a message for all the Zealots and Bigots out there who just don’t seem to have any tolerance for each other… stop wasting everyone’s time by trying to convince each other yours is bigger, stronger, better, and more robust.  Use your tool however you feel you need to, and I’ll keep using whatever tool I need to get my own job done.

    Wednesday - June 15, 2005

    On this Day In History

    Filed under: Humor — DB @ 12:01 am

    1752 - Benjamin Franklin flew the kite with a key tied to its string and
    proved that lightning contained electricity, a fact frequently ignored by golfers who like to play in lightning storms holding metal clubs.

    1775 - The Second Continental Congress voted unanimously to appoint George
    Washington as head of the Continental Army.   I often thought they should have elected Martha to give head, but what do I know.

    1836 - Arkansas became the 25th state.   C’mon… you know… it’s that state way down there below Missery.

    1844 - Charles Goodyear received a patent for his process to strengthen
    rubber.  A fact that many unwed mothers would find issue with I’m sure.

    1846 - Representatives of Great Britain and the United States signed the
    Oregon Treaty, which established the US-Canadian border.  It is also not widely known that few if any of them could either draw a straight line, or hold their liquor.

    1956 - Sixteen-year-old John Lennon of the music group, The Quarrymen, met
    14-year-old Paul McCartney and invited him to join the group.  Who the hell knows what George and Ringo were doing at the time… don’t ask.

    1969 - "Hee Haw" premiered on TV.  Proving, once again, that all the truly good TV has already been done.

    Sunday - June 12, 2005

    Little Tude

    Filed under: Friends — DB @ 10:07 am

    B’Tude finally gave in and we signed Little Tude up for his own blog.  Now if we just had about two more computers in this house we’d have it made!!

    Go visit lil’ Tude at his Dragon Rage site and say hi… he’s eleven, so be good :)

    Next Page »
    Powered by: WordPress • Modified from an Original Template by: Priss   © 2004 - 2006 D. Brooks-All Rights Reserved.